Dating sites ads mental health dating service

e spent nearly .6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

||

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.

.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent .6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a dating sites ads-70 .57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

||

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.

.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking,

e spent nearly .6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

||

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.

.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent .6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a dating sites ads-70 .57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

||

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.

.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, [[

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

||

e spent nearly $3.6 million and drove 3.2 million clicks at a $1.11 average CPC, while another IAC brand Our spent $2.6 million and drove 4.6 million clicks at a $0.57 average CPC.

Perhaps the most successful brand in the ranking was Zoosk.com, which spent just $1.2 million but drove the second most clicks, nearly 4.9 million, at the lowest average cost per click in the ranking, $0.25.

]].25.

.25.Millions of people are signed up on free and paid dating sites, giving them a large audience.

[[ dating sites ads-65 || dating sites ads-70 ]]

The amount online dating sites have spent on national TV ads in the first five months of this year have nearly matched the amount spent for all of 2013, according to data from research firm i Spot.

Of the online dating market’s 14 brands, the top five names account for nearly 95% of that ad spend, according to i Spot’s data.

If you sell an expensive or high-end product, you may not want to advertise on a free, poorly designed website.

If you are comfortable with the content and design of the site, you can add it to the list of sites to contact for additional information. Look near the top and bottom of the main page of the site. If not, try the About or Contact Us pages to find out who to contact.

For comparison, the second ranked advertiser, the reviews site Top10Best Dating Sites.com, spent nearly $5.6 million and generated just around 1.2 million clicks at an average CPC of $4.81.

Comments